Prototype cloaking device removes you from spacetime
BacillaFilla: Fixing Cracks in Concrete
Sweet way to make graphene – just add table sugar
Been listening to a *LOT* of Spoon lately. They’re easily the best band I’ve never heard of prior to 2010. Thanks Pandora.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoon_%28band%29
Engadget has a video review of iOS 4.2 running on an iPad over at their site:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/ios-4-2-on-ipad-preview-video/
It looks pretty sweet, and most importantly of all, performance doesn’t seem to suffer. I’ll admit, I’ve been using my iPad less lately since it can be frustrating not to be able to pull off a chat and simple browsing session at the same time without wasting half your time logging in and out of AIM and waiting for Safari to re-initialize.
iOS 4.2 for iPad is slated for a November release according to Apple.
IDC released their worldwide quarterly numbers for mobile device operating system market share last week, and whether you look at the current market, or the predicted 2014 market, it doesn’t look good for Apple.
The skinny: Android is kicking Apple’s ass.
To figure out why, let’s go back in time, to January of 2007. Apple releases the original iPhone, and the usual suspects of Apple-loving zealots (the crowd that buys and loves *EVERYTHING* that Apple makes) buys one, and shows their friends. Some of these friends end up being real people, not already drinking the Apple kool-aid, and they realize pretty quickly that Apple was onto something big here.
Much like they did with the iPod, Apple entered the mobile phone game at a time when the technology had matured enough to truly make a “smart phone”, where some tasks that we previously relied solely on our PC’s and laptops for, started to make sense in our pockets if done right. The iPhone did them right, from the web to rich email, youtube, maps, and eventually: apps.
Within a year, since Apple successfully proved the fees-ability of a “smart phone” to the mass market beyond early adopters and business users, everyone and their brother in the carrier and handset business tried to copy their success. They all failed. . . miserably. Why buy the imitation handset, with imitation OS tied to it, when you can buy the original. Google however, in their infinite wisdom, and with their deep pockets attacked from a different angle and started developing Android, a mobile OS that would run on not just their own hardware, but hardware from other vendors that chose to license it (or license the functionality of a “store” for apps, etc.) By this time, Apple had amassed zillions of apps in it’s own app store, and had a pretty damn big chunk of market share. The general public, if they could afford it, had totally adopted the idea of “smart” in their pocket, and everyone wanted an iPhone.
In October of 2008, Google rolls out Android, and all the “Apple haters” that secretly wanted an iPhone, but wouldn’t be caught dead with anything Apple-branded, instantly buy an Android device and start consuming/writing Android apps. It takes a while, but adoption gains traction, and the UI becomes friendlier, more stable, and more standard. Most important of all, carriers and handset vendors, still licking the wounds from their failed-iPhone-copycat-devices start seeing that you CAN compete with Apple’s iPhone, you just have to work together.
Fast-Forward to present day, late summer 2010. Apple had a rocky iPhone 4 release (antennagate, pre-order hell, etc.), and the folks that bought an iPhone, but aren’t married to Apple otherwise are starting to get sick and tired of Apple telling them which apps they can and can’t run. This didn’t matter so much when they were the only game in town, but now there’ s competition, and it’s looking a whole lot more “open” on the other side of the fence.
Need proof? Here’s the chart from IDC:
Let’s just concentrate on the 2010 column for now. Android commands 16.3% of the market, while Apple holds 14.7%. Symbian, the 800lb gorilla here is almost irrelevant since the 40.1% they hold reflects folks with std. handsets no different that what’s been out for the last 10+ years. I view all of these as consumers that will eventually be buying Android devices, iPhone’s or Windows Mobile devices.
What about BlackBerry? Personally speaking, I think they’re on their way out. Their time has come and gone, and unless they do something drastic like re-write their UI to run on Android, and license the Android app store. . goodbye.
Windows Mobile has probably the best shot at gaining some of that Symbian market share alongside iPhone and Android. Their previous mobile OS’s have been such shit, that at this point the fact that they’re brazen enough to even release the next version has a lot of people convinced they’ve done their homework this time. I guess the jury’s out until Windows Mobile 7 is 3-6 months into release and the numbers talk, and we see if they can carve out a space for a 3rd app “store”.
Apple biggest strength in this game is their biggest weakness. It’s their private, locked-gate community built atop their closed OS and tightly-controlled app store. While cautious parents, and technology illiterate consumers love the ease of knowing that most of the apps they can buy are reasonably safe, the savvy folks that bought iPhone’s for their sleek industrial design, quality, and hardware features are fed up, and in many cases going underground for what they want.
Jailbreaking has started to become mainstream on iPhone’s and the latest news of a jailbreak based on a HW-level exploit is just fuel on the fire. With each release of iOS, Apple closes the old exploits, the jailbreaking community finds new ones, and life goes on. Why jailbreak? Jailbreaking let’s users run any application they want with or without Apple’s approval. In the past, the jailbreaking community was looked-upon as a bunch of shadowy figures operating outside the law, but on July 25th, 2010 the Library of Congress ruled that jailbreaking was explicitly exempted from provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, making it now more mainstream than ever. Apple, undaunted by the ruling, maintains jailbreaking is naughty, continues to close exploits, and refuses to support jailbroken iPhone’s in any way at all.
Let’s look at that chart again (scroll up if you don’t have photographic memory). As you can see in the 2014 column, the tech-savvy folks not joined to Apple at the hip have moved on and bought Android or Windows Mobile devices. I don’t agree quite as enthusiastically with the chart regarding uptake on Windows Mobile, but hey, if they finally get it right, it could happen. Like all closed-gate communities, with tight rules and regulations, there’s only so many people that WANT to live there, and as the smart handheld device marketplace gets better overall, more folks are willing to live on the other side of the fence.
The solution? Apple needs to embrace jailbreaking. Now, I’m not suggesting they open the app store to ANY application, or permit any OS to run on their hardware, but what if you had a choice?
Take the blue pill, stay inside the gated community, and run the apps Papa Steve says are good. Unsigned code doesn’t run, you go to Apple heaven at the end of your life, and the geniuses at the Apple bar are happy to help you with every little thing.
OR
Take the red pill, accept the long winded agreement accepting the risk of running un-signed code, etc, etc. and unlock the ability to use other non-apple app markets or stores, and your support is limited to the hardware itself. Direct all other complaints straight at yourself.
The consumer still gets kick-ass Apple hardware, with the choice of living ultra-safe, or taking a few risks and increasing the usability of their devices, while Apple can quit wasting money on thwarting jailbreakers and keep their support costs low.
BAM. Everyone wins.
It’
s only Tuesday, and there’s already 2 epic tales of regular everyday working class folks throwing in the towel with more class (or lack there-of) than most of us could dream about.
First, there’s Steven Slater from Queens who, after a verbal engagement with an obnoxious passenger, grabbed a couple brewskis from the beverage cart, popped the emergency chute, cursed over the PA, and slid to personal freedom while the plane was still moving (only to be picked up by the cops later):
If that’s not enough, a woman, Jenny, allegedly quit her job, for being referred to by her boss as a HOPA, by mass-mailing everyone at her company a series of pictures featuring her and a dry-erase board:
http://thechive.com/2010/08/10/girl-quits-her-job-on-dry-erase-board-emails-entire-office-33-photos/
UPDATE: Dry-Erase girl is confirmed a hoax. I knew it was too good to be true!
http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/11/elyse-porterfield/
The photograph to the left is “against the rules”.
That’s right, I took it in the Lehigh Valley Mall, which expressly prohibits any and all sort of photography on mall property. I know this, because I’m the photographer in this case, and while wielding my iPhone 4, a mere 12 inches from my daughters face, I was approached by mall security and told to immediately cease what I was doing.
Shocked, I asked for an explanation, and was told all forms of photography and videography have been illegal in the mall since “9/11″, with security instructed to confiscate film and delete photos when witnessed.
That’s right, a couple terrorists, upset at our freedoms and beliefs managed to get photography banned in a mall. I think I could have let it go if she said folks had complained about creeps following them around with 500mm lenses or something, but no, the reason given was “9/11″. We’ve got men and women thousands of miles from home, giving their lives everyday to protect basic freedoms, but I can’t take a picture of my daughter from 12 INCHES away in a mall on a Saturday.
I guess I didn’t look to pleased with the explanation given, since the security guard went on to state that they had found friends posting pics of each other in the mall on Facebook, flickr, etc. and it’s “just not right”. Yeh, I agree . . . It’s “just not right” that those kids, pockets full of their parents money and plastic would want to go to the mall thinking it’s trendy and chic like everything else they do because they saw it in a picture on Facebook. Thank god the brick and mortars of the world aren’t willing to embrace the free benefits of social networking. The online business of merely tracking the effect of social networks on purchasing decisions across all age groups per day is probably larger than what the entire Lehigh Valley Mall grosses in a year.
I love this country, and it’s rich history chock full of freedom and independence, but common sense, today, is all to often lacking.
“
If you can’t make it good, make it 3-D”!
That’s becoming the popular phrase around Hollywood since everyone on the inside knows people are willing to flock in droves right now to anything that’s 3-D. A 2-hour documentary about the invention of the paper clip could probably gross as much as your typical run of the mill romantic comedy if it was released in 3-D.
While casual moviegoers may not be wise to the driving force of 3-D: profit, the talented folks on the inside that make up the creative force behind the movies we love, are. Folks like Joss Whedon and JJ Abrams have gone on the record with statements like, “When you put the glasses on, everything gets dim”, and “3-D technology does little to enhance a cinematic story”.
I wholeheartedly agree. I think 3-D in movies, at least as implemented today, is nothing more than a parlor trick that hinders and in many cases blocks the creative shooting and production techniques used to convey the spirit of the feature to moviegoers. Maybe that sounds old-fashioned, but in my opinion, movies have been 3-D since the beginning. It’s called depth of field, and it’s controlled by what aperture the director chooses in a given shot, and what point within that plane is focused on.
Just say no to nerd glasses, higher ticket prices, and parlor tricks that are as old as the 3-D photograph. . cuz hey, we all now how well stereoscopes for 3-D photos caught on right?
Sometime in the last week I starting getting 3G on my iPhone at home. Has anyone else noticed this? I’m not exactly sure when it arrived, but I sure hope it’s here to stay 
A quick speed test shows about 1.5mbps down and 768k up. Not bad, not bad at all.
As detailed here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38463013/ns/technology_and_science-security/
100 million facebook users have had their info compiled into a single dataset which has been published online.
Sure, the info was freely available as of when it was compiled, but this means people don’t get the option to adjust their facebook privacy controls to prevent access to this info today, tomorrow, or anytime, since your info is now available in a torrent that’s hit all the popular torrenting sites.
Bottom line: if you don’t want information to be public now or EVER. . don’t put it online.
Heard this on NPR, and it really rang true in a lot of ways. Over the years, I’ve definitely worked with both types of managers, and it’s truly a blessing when someone is a “multiplier” as this transcript describes:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128401148